Informed
You want a read, not a seat in decisions.
- Companies own execution
- Sponsor gets an aggregated read on posture and exposure
- No operational data pulled centrally
Private equity firms, holding companies, and any group managing cyber risk across many entities face the same problem: a stack of security reports that do not compare. Core3 puts every company on one model and one operating view, so the sponsor can see the whole portfolio on a single page.
Running a single-company assessment thirty or a hundred times does not produce a portfolio view. It produces thirty or a hundred separate reports the sponsor cannot line up against each other. Every company sits at a different point on its cyber journey, and most are reluctant to hand operational data up to the sponsor. The result is a portfolio the sponsor cannot actually see, let alone govern.
What the sponsor asked for, who has done it, and where exposure is heading. Sortable by fund, industry, or region, with the biggest gaps first.
The sponsor decides what matters most, whether MFA, asset management, or board reporting, and pins it to the top for every company.
Once the sponsor sets a priority, the view reports who has done it and who has not. Rollout status per company, without a call to each one.
Whether exposure is rising or falling over time, per company and across the whole book.
Every action mapped to NIST CSF 2.0. No custom vocabulary the next sponsor has to relearn.
Total cyber risk across the portfolio in dollars, and how much each company contributes to it.
Everything else that moves exposure, ordered by the risk it removes, so priorities stay honest.
Each company sees where it stands and its own ranked list of next actions, so the program is useful to them, not just to the sponsor.
The same view surfaces duplicated spend. Where several companies carry separate tools closing the same gap, the overlap shows across the book as well as inside one company, so consolidation can be priced before it is proposed.
How the sponsor view itself is secured is part of the first conversation.
Each company enters at whatever depth it can support today, on the same model underneath. The portfolio view is useful at every stage, and it sharpens as companies engage more deeply.
Companies share an assessment they already have. Core3 loads it into the model. No interviews and no new work, just enough to rank the portfolio and know where to focus first.
Deeper engagement with the companies that warrant it: control effectiveness confirmed against live evidence from the tools they already run, not accepted on faith.
A continuous cadence across the portfolio. The sponsor sees change as it happens, each company sees its own trajectory, and no one faces an annual scramble.
The model configures around your operating style, and it evolves as your comfort grows.
You want a read, not a seat in decisions.
Cyber is part of your value creation.
Different companies, different modes.
The first baseline gives the sponsor a portfolio-wide position on day one: where each company stands, what has been done, and a first exposure estimate. It is exactly that, a starting point: as live evidence and deeper data come in, the estimate sharpens from an initial estimate into a validated read, and the story gets stronger every quarter. The first improvements land quickly, and over time they compound into a track record the sponsor can put in front of fund investors.
Begin with a small first cohort across a range of maturities, prove the model on that cohort, then roll it out in waves. It starts with a short scoping call, ideally with one portfolio company's security lead in the room.